Maybe you guys have already seen this story http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...(Top+Stories+2)), but Darpa is trying to develop the “cyber equivalent of fingerprints or DNA” to identify criminal hackers. They are calling it the Cyber Genome project, and although it sounds fascinating, I am not sure how they are really going to implement this idea. I know someone would find a way around it. I found it to be intriguing because if this project is successful, it may have a significant impact on cyber terrorism and computer-based information warfare operations. What do you guys think about it?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Digital DNA?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Digital DNA?
I can't see how its possible, anti-virus companies haven't been sucessful with even fingerprinting the simple stuff, maybe fingerprinting stupid mistakes like meta data thats been included unawares.
It'll still all come down to politics, I do find it a bit difficult to stomach the amount of faith they have in google engineers guesses being down to china and potentially miltary, seems more like an agenda, so it'll still be fit the evidence to the crime, regardless of any real data.- Null Space Labs
-
Re: Digital DNA?
Originally posted by AgentDarkApple View PostMaybe you guys have already seen this story http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...(Top+Stories+2)), but Darpa is trying to develop the “cyber equivalent of fingerprints or DNA” to identify criminal hackers. They are calling it the Cyber Genome project, and although it sounds fascinating, I am not sure how they are really going to implement this idea. I know someone would find a way around it. I found it to be intriguing because if this project is successful, it may have a significant impact on cyber terrorism and computer-based information warfare operations. What do you guys think about it?
xorJust because you can doesn't mean you should. This applies to making babies, hacking, and youtube videos.
Comment
-
Re: Digital DNA?
aside from possibly being, as xor pointed out, just IPv6 with lots of fluff padded around it... i'd say this proposal has enough buzzwords and wishful thinking to be worth at least 2 to 3 million in government funding thrown on their particular cash bonfire until someone pulls a plug somewhere. in this current shaky economic market, you get charlatans coming out of the woodwork from all angles trying to suckle at the taxpayer teat instead of doing real work... and it sounds like this tall tale fits that angle quite nicely for whomever invented it."I'll admit I had an OiNK account and frequented it quite often… What made OiNK a great place was that it was like the world's greatest record store… iTunes kind of feels like Sam Goody to me. I don't feel cool when I go there. I'm tired of seeing John Mayer's face pop up. I feel like I'm being hustled when I visit there, and I don't think their product is that great. DRM, low bit rate, etc... OiNK it existed because it filled a void of what people want."
- Trent Reznor
Comment
-
Re: Digital DNA?
Originally posted by Deviant Ollam View Postyou get charlatans coming out of the woodwork from all angles trying to suckle at the taxpayer teat instead of doing real work... and it sounds like this tall tale fits that angle quite nicely for whomever invented it."Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users? " - Clifford Stoll
Comment
-
Re: Digital DNA?
Even say they had a valid IPV6, the bad guy writes something, goes to an open wireless/public access point/stolen network/laptop, how could it be traced, even if it is traced and its in a country with limited access, what then ? I just don't see the difference to how it is now.
Aside from all the buzzwords and the current google got their ass kicked in china controversy this technology,if at all possible, would more than likely be used locally just to add to the evidence list.
Like DO says just a way of getting money, its a good time to do it with all the current talk of china and cyberattack this and that.- Null Space Labs
Comment
-
Re: Digital DNA?
I think no matter what they do, the main people they are trying to stop (criminal hackers, terrorists, hackers working for enemy nations) will simply see it as another challenge to their skill or intellect and will find a way to overcome it. Maybe it is just meant to "comfort the American people" like so many of the other lies we have been told over the past decade."Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users? " - Clifford Stoll
Comment
-
Re: Digital DNA?
Yep I'd agree with that, i think its just a necessary part of the human psyche. Like positive reinforcement ( which i'm terrible at, i wonder if most hackers are ).
Unfortunately it probably is fairly vital to the economy as well, it does seem you can attract more bees with vinegar than honey when it comes to this type of thing. I'm off to register projectvinegarpot.org- Null Space Labs
Comment
Comment