Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DC13 Rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DC13 Rules

    The latest rules for the 2005 Robot Warez are up!

    http://robotwarez.org

    If you have any questions than you can post them here until we get the forums up on robotwarez.org
    --- The fuck? Have you ever BEEN to Defcon?

  • #2
    Questions:

    *Can the cans be knocked down prior to running to the opposite side of the maze?

    *Can the bot traverse back to the starting side of the maze before firing shots at the cans?

    LosT

    Comment


    • #3
      when i was asking kallahar about some of the rules prior to their release, the emphesis was on freedom of interpretation of the rules....

      read: if you dont ask, you cant be told no.
      the fresh prince of 1337

      To learn how to hack; submit your request

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by KeLviN
        when i was asking kallahar about some of the rules prior to their release, the emphesis was on freedom of interpretation of the rules....

        read: if you dont ask, you cant be told no.

        Sounds like a good general rule for everything defcon.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by KeLviN
          read: if you dont ask, you cant be told no.
          And the reverse is also ture "If you HAVE to ask, the answer is NO"
          "Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups"

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by hackajar
            And the reverse is also ture "If you HAVE to ask, the answer is NO"
            I don't think the converse is always true.

            LosT

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by LosT
              I don't think the converse is always true.

              LosT
              Not only that, that also wasn't really the converse.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by lucifex
                Not only that, that also wasn't really the converse.
                You're correct, not *really* - I wasn't in one of my nerdiest of moods to do the actual notation and a bunch of truth tables covering all the possible variations either ;) (Almost, but not quite. )

                Contrapositively,

                LosT

                Comment

                Working...
                X