Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pink Floyd reunites!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tao_of_pi
    replied
    Originally posted by Clp727
    If they ever do come to the states again, I will go out of my way to see them. The sad thing is that alot of the younger crowd has never even listened to them. It's almost un American to have grown up and NOT seen the movie "The Wall". I had to view that movie a few times to understand it, but the animation was worth it. But then again...some people just didn't like their stuff. Oh well...
    Most of my friends listen to Pink Floyd, they're on the radio all the time too. Although I don't have the movie I own the album along with "Dark Side of the Moon".

    Leave a comment:


  • Clp727
    replied
    If they ever do come to the states again, I will go out of my way to see them. The sad thing is that alot of the younger crowd has never even listened to them. It's almost un American to have grown up and NOT seen the movie "The Wall". I had to view that movie a few times to understand it, but the animation was worth it. But then again...some people just didn't like their stuff. Oh well...

    Leave a comment:


  • bascule
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby_Normal
    Have you seen the line ups for the different shows? How come London gets Pink Floyd while we in the US get Bon jovi? WTF?
    I just hope they tour again (the Floyd of course)

    Somehow the thought of David Gilmour and Roger Waters back together makes me think that they'll be able to stand each other about as long as Diamond Dave and the Red Rocker could when they toured together... but a man can dream...

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby_Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by psyco_path
    I like Fark's explination.

    The band was to f-ed up to remember live aid 1.
    That wasn't Pink Floyd, it was Status Quo who made that statement.

    Google news is your friend.
    Last edited by Abby_Normal; June 14, 2005, 11:19. Reason: Needed more cowbell

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby_Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Xodia
    I agree with that. The prosecution did a terrible job even if Michael was guilty.

    But to get the thread back on subject, why did Roger Waters just now decide to get back together with them? Did he find Live Aid to be that important of an event or did he just want some moolah?
    A very good question. I haven't been following his career or anything, but last i checked his solo stuff wasn't doing that well.

    Have you seen the line ups for the different shows? How come London gets Pink Floyd while we in the US get Bon jovi? WTF?

    On the bright side, London also gets Mariah Carey, maybe she'll stay there.

    Leave a comment:


  • psyco_path
    replied
    I like Fark's explination.

    The band was to f-ed up to remember live aid 1.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xodia
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby_Normal
    I'm not saying he's innocent, I'm saying they made a bad case.
    I agree with that. The prosecution did a terrible job even if Michael was guilty.

    But to get the thread back on subject, why did Roger Waters just now decide to get back together with them? Did he find Live Aid to be that important of an event or did he just want some moolah?

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby_Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Second
    I just think that anyone who does what he did should be punished. Sleeping with little kids...having porno in the room with them..that kind of stuff, isn't right.
    I agree, if he did any of that. But so far all they have proved is he might of slept in the same bed with kids, which isn't wrong. Not a smart thing to do, but not like molesting a kid, which is a killing offence in my book.

    True the mother shouldn't have let her kids there, but she wouldn't have the opportunity to allow them if the offer wasn't made in the first place. It's not like she threw her kids at the gate of his ranch and said, "PLEASE, take my kids into your bed with you."
    She knew he'd been accused of molesting kids in the past. That would be enough for me to not let my child sleep over.

    She also lied about her kids insurance to get money, and hit other celebs up for money. Doesn't make her look good.

    Your point about the 3rd world country is a good one, and I agree, but that doesn't take away from what happened here.
    If anything happened.

    Whatever, it's just what I think.
    And if he did it, I totaly agree with you.

    However, they didn't present a believeable case. Which is sad if the kid really was molested. It would suck if the mother being an asshole blew it for her kid.

    I'm not saying he's innocent, I'm saying they made a bad case.

    Leave a comment:


  • astcell
    replied
    I found Pink.

    Right here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tao_of_pi
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby_Normal
    I also think the mother should be charged for allowing her kids to sleep over at jackson's in the first place. Any good parent who was not hoping to make a quick buck would have never allowed that.
    the sad thing is Jak-o's still booking kids a year in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Second
    replied
    I just think that anyone who does what he did should be punished. Sleeping with little kids...having porno in the room with them..that kind of stuff, isn't right.

    True the mother shouldn't have let her kids there, but she wouldn't have the opportunity to allow them if the offer wasn't made in the first place. It's not like she threw her kids at the gate of his ranch and said, "PLEASE, take my kids into your bed with you."

    Your point about the 3rd world country is a good one, and I agree, but that doesn't take away from what happened here.

    Whatever, it's just what I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby_Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Second
    Speaking of depressed...Jack-o was acquitted of all ten charges.....he should die.
    Why so hostile, did he touch your special place or something?

    Frankly, I don't know if he did it or not. All I was convinced of is that he's quite insane.

    I thought the mother and child did not seem sincere at all. She seeming like a lying bitch who would use her kid to get money.

    I also think the mother should be charged for allowing her kids to sleep over at jackson's in the first place. Any good parent who was not hoping to make a quick buck would have never allowed that.

    There was reasonable doubt, imho. At least why I saw, I didn't watch all the coverage or anything. And to be honest, I'm just glad it's over so we can stop hearing about it.

    The main reason I think he may not have done it was there is no reason too. You can buy a kid in many 3rd would countries for a carton of smokes for fucks sake. Why rick molesting a kid with parents when you can buy your vary own sex slave who no one will ever come looking for.

    Just a thought.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clp727
    replied
    This is GREAT news. I hope for a world tour in the future. Very talented band.

    Leave a comment:


  • Second
    replied
    Speaking of depressed...Jack-o was acquitted of all ten charges.....he should die.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gadsden
    replied
    Originally posted by bascule
    Pink isn't well... he stayed back at the hotel...
    I hear he got depressed, and started the Blue Man Group.

    /me ducks to avoid the thrown objects.. ya gotta love my postings after 3 hours of sleep..

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X