Conficker C

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • barry99705
    Member
    • Sep 2007
    • 302

    #46
    Re: Conficker C

    Originally posted by [Syntax]
    Well I happened upon a network the day it became active.. the 8th I think, and discovered 18 machines all scanning each other, the switch struggling and the buffer on the router to the outside full up. I was called out for "slow internet" the ISP told me they saw tons of traffic going to china, mexico, and middle east countries. They traced one connection down to a machine at a pharmaceutical company in New Jersey. The ISP commented about 1200 UDP connections in less than 2 seconds as he was watching the traffic scroll past him.

    So.. now Im left with the task of cleaning all 18 machines, on a domain, where the virus has stolen all the domain accounts and has admin to local machine and domain accounts, and I have to clean them all while not disabling the entire company from doing business.
    Im sure all their thumb drives are infected, the employees with laptops took it home to their home pc's, and who knows what else. Should be a fun week tackling this job..

    Interesting though, one article I read said the new C/D variant has a shutoff date of May something.
    Been there done that. It's loads of fun. Nice thing is corporate(who's in Europe) turned off our vpn and shut down the outside connection to the world. We then went in and unplugged all the machines from the routers. Took all day to scan and clean about forty machines.

    Comment

    • g3k_
      General rogue
      • Jan 2009
      • 358

      #47
      Re: Conficker C

      Originally posted by [Syntax]
      Well I happened upon a network the day it became active.. the 8th I think, and discovered 18 machines all scanning each other, the switch struggling and the buffer on the router to the outside full up. I was called out for "slow internet" the ISP told me they saw tons of traffic going to china, mexico, and middle east countries. They traced one connection down to a machine at a pharmaceutical company in New Jersey. The ISP commented about 1200 UDP connections in less than 2 seconds as he was watching the traffic scroll past him.

      So.. now Im left with the task of cleaning all 18 machines, on a domain, where the virus has stolen all the domain accounts and has admin to local machine and domain accounts, and I have to clean them all while not disabling the entire company from doing business.
      Im sure all their thumb drives are infected, the employees with laptops took it home to their home pc's, and who knows what else. Should be a fun week tackling this job..

      Interesting though, one article I read said the new C/D variant has a shutoff date of May something.
      Check out the link in my signature. That should help you out.
      "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

      Comment

      • g3k_
        General rogue
        • Jan 2009
        • 358

        #48
        Re: Conficker C

        Interestingly enough, it seems that conficker now downloads blackmailware and spams the user's PC for $49.95 for a anti-virus suite :P

        While this is playground stuff, I find it kind of amusing.

        http://arstechnica.com/security/news...tion-alert.ars
        "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

        Comment

        • bascule
          omgpwnies!
          • Jul 2003
          • 1946

          #49
          Re: Conficker C

          Originally posted by streaker69
          I am kind of disappointed in this though. I was kind of looking forward to interpocalypse, or maybe 1 billion telephones ringing at the same time.
          Or a DDoS against the root nameservers, which could effectively shut down the Internet itself.
          45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B0
          45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B1
          [ redacted ]

          Comment

          • streaker69
            • Mar 2008
            • 1141

            #50
            Re: Conficker C

            Originally posted by bascule
            Or a DDoS against the root nameservers, which could effectively shut down the Internet itself.
            Good thing I memorized the top 100,000,000 million IP addresses of websites so I don't have to use DNS. :)
            A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.

            Comment

            • barry99705
              Member
              • Sep 2007
              • 302

              #51
              Re: Conficker C

              heh, wasn't reading....

              Comment

              • bascule
                omgpwnies!
                • Jul 2003
                • 1946

                #52
                Re: Conficker C

                It would appear that Conficker is being used to distribute spam and malware
                45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B0
                45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B1
                [ redacted ]

                Comment

                • valkyrie
                  Member
                  • Jan 2006
                  • 360

                  #53
                  Re: Conficker C

                  Originally posted by bascule
                  this surprised you, how?

                  Regards,

                  valkyrie
                  ___________________________________________
                  sapere aude

                  Comment

                  • bascule
                    omgpwnies!
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 1946

                    #54
                    Re: Conficker C

                    Originally posted by valkyrie
                    this surprised you, how?
                    It doesn't surprise me, and it's certainly what I expected. It's pretty much the only way to monetize a botnet.

                    I think it's interesting they're using Conficker to plug infected hosts into existing botnets. I haven't seen that before.
                    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B0
                    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B1
                    [ redacted ]

                    Comment

                    • valkyrie
                      Member
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 360

                      #55
                      Re: Conficker C

                      Originally posted by bascule
                      It doesn't surprise me, and it's certainly what I expected. It's pretty much the only way to monetize a botnet.

                      I think it's interesting they're using Conficker to plug infected hosts into existing botnets. I haven't seen that before.
                      As you noted, they have found a way to increase monetization of the botnets. I agree that using an infection to further zombize infected hosts is indeed interesting.

                      Regards,

                      valkyrie
                      __________________________________________________ ___
                      sapere aude

                      Comment

                      • YenTheFirst
                        Member
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 282

                        #56
                        Re: Conficker C

                        I've got a somewhat interesting query:
                        I decided to look at some decompiles of the MS08-067 vulnerability, the one conficker uses.
                        One such decompile: http://www.phreedom.org/blog/2008/decompiling-ms08-067/

                        What mystifies me, though, is this code doesn't crash is the spot it's 'supposed' to.
                        When I run it, it doesn't even get bit where the pointer walks back before the beginning of the buffer, it crashes on:
                        Code:
                        wcscpy(previous_slash, &p[2]);
                        What I find odd about this, is, according to the C specification, you can't use wcscpy (or strcpy) on overlapping buffers, and both previous_slash and p are pointers to the same buffer.

                        does Windows implement wcscpy differently?
                        It's not stupid, it's advanced.

                        Comment

                        • barry99705
                          Member
                          • Sep 2007
                          • 302

                          #57
                          Re: Conficker C

                          Originally posted by YenTheFirst

                          does Windows implement wcscpy differently?
                          Beats me, but when doesn't windows implement something differently?

                          Comment

                          • b0n3z
                            Goon
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 137

                            #58
                            Re: Conficker C

                            And it still hasn't died...

                            linky
                            Saving the world one computer at a time...

                            or possibly destroying, I haven't figured that out yet.

                            Comment

                            Working...