Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xor
    not
    • Aug 2007
    • 1347

    #16
    Re: Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

    Originally posted by Thorn
    Put the onus on my subjects, er, citizens and suddenly make the use of WiFi devices illegal. Hey, if the government can revoke all press credentials overnight, then they can make WiFi device possession illegal. .
    Note to self, never make Thorn king.

    xor
    Just because you can doesn't mean you should. This applies to making babies, hacking, and youtube videos.

    Comment

    • streaker69
      • Mar 2008
      • 1141

      #17
      Re: Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

      Originally posted by xor
      Note to self, never make Thorn king.

      xor
      He was already king once, maybe you remember, Edward the Longshanks.
      A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.

      Comment

      • TheCotMan
        *****Retired *****
        • May 2004
        • 8857

        #18
        Re: Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

        And what else could they do?
        IT People: if you let this happen, we will teach you a lesson!

        If it wasn't clear, here is what I was looking to highlight:
        Originally posted by url
        There were also unconfirmed reports that Mohammad Asgari, who was responsible for the security of the IT network in Iran's interior ministry, was killed yesterday in a suspicious car accident in Tehran. Asgari had reportedly leaked evidence that the elections were rigged to alter the votes from the provinces. Asgari was said to have leaked information that showed Mousavi had won almost 19m votes, and should therefore be president.
        (Found on the dc-stuff mailing list, and forwarded from an aother alerts mailing list.)

        If we assume this was planned by people in their government because of leaked information, what is a little Denial of Service for telecommunications? What business owners will disagree with them when they show their level of commitment?

        I wouldn't bother with providing people in Iran proxies. Necessity tends to encourage creativity from the people that have the need. Why not see what they will invent on their own?
        Last edited by TheCotMan; June 18, 2009, 20:54.

        Comment

        • xor
          not
          • Aug 2007
          • 1347

          #19
          Re: Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

          Originally posted by TheCotMan
          There were also unconfirmed reports that Mohammad Asgari, who was responsible for the security of the IT network in Iran's interior ministry, was killed yesterday in a suspicious car accident in Tehran. Asgari had reportedly leaked evidence that the elections were rigged to alter the votes from the provinces. Asgari was said to have leaked information that showed Mousavi had won almost 19m votes, and should therefore be president.
          The kind of car accident where the driver cashes their car due to small round 7.62mm holes in the windshield.

          xor
          Just because you can doesn't mean you should. This applies to making babies, hacking, and youtube videos.

          Comment

          • C-Rex
            Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 12

            #20
            Re: Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

            Interesting article on the DOS or Not DOS debate...

            http://personaldemocracy.com/blog-en...laborative-web

            Some snippets...
            "First, "sticking it to The Man" is not a standard philosophical justification, but there is something about it that feels so right." :)

            We can assume that from now on, something like this is going to happen every time a citizenry butts heads with its government. Still, we--the technopolitics community--need to consider the morality of this tactic, as our collective ability to spread the "Attack!" message is not inconsequential.

            Comment

            • C-Rex
              Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 12

              #21
              Re: Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

              Another one, more practical, latest update CALLS for Attacks...

              http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009...le/#more-13774

              Comment

              • Schuyler
                Locksport Enthusiast
                • Apr 2007
                • 143

                #22
                Re: Proxies for the Iranian Dissidents

                Originally posted by b0n3z
                Having been in the middle east, it wouldn't surprise me to see people with their own personal connections running over their.

                I saw satellite dishes all over the place in Iraq, so I wouldn't be surprised if Iran has/had the same set-up.
                On the second or third night of protests the Basij began going door to door removing or destroying satellite dishes. Not that this, obviously, cuts off all possibilities, but the govt. & their militia (Basij are volunteer militia reporting to the revolutionary guard, not army or police) are certainly going all out in an attempt to cut communications. As cotman was mentioning, of course, necessity is the mother of invention. Hard to suppress communication routes you can't expect.

                That said? Sometimes what they can come up with is a way to reach halfway across the wall, hoping for a hand on the other side.

                Comment

                Working...