Re: Welcome to DEF CON 21! How would you make DEF CON 22 even better?
I agree, most of the time I would rather be looking at the slides, not the speaker. It would be great if they would send it to the TV's like it appears on the video downloads that are released after the con (slides & speaker).
One problem with transmitting the slides is that they may not be readable. It appeared to me that the video feeds were NTSC, not ATSC. Fine for the speaks, terrible for graphics.
The component to mux MPEG streams into a single QAM channel is not terribly expensive (around $1,500-$2,000). All the DC channels would fit into a single QAM channel (4-5 channels per QAM channel). It starts to add up once you account for a box to convert DVI/HDMI/VGA to ASI. It could be done. I wonder if a friend of mine would lend out his QAM box for DEF CON to try out. It would be a fun project.
(Thule)
I agree, most of the time I would rather be looking at the slides, not the speaker. It would be great if they would send it to the TV's like it appears on the video downloads that are released after the con (slides & speaker).
One problem with transmitting the slides is that they may not be readable. It appeared to me that the video feeds were NTSC, not ATSC. Fine for the speaks, terrible for graphics.
The component to mux MPEG streams into a single QAM channel is not terribly expensive (around $1,500-$2,000). All the DC channels would fit into a single QAM channel (4-5 channels per QAM channel). It starts to add up once you account for a box to convert DVI/HDMI/VGA to ASI. It could be done. I wonder if a friend of mine would lend out his QAM box for DEF CON to try out. It would be a fun project.
(Thule)
Comment