ComputerWeekly declares OpenVMS "Hack Proof"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bascule
    omgpwnies!
    • Jul 2003
    • 1946

    #1

    ComputerWeekly declares OpenVMS "Hack Proof"

    I saw this little bit of OpenVMS zealotry in ComputerWeekly:

    Hack-proof and crash resistant - have you discovered the OS world's best-kept secret? OpenVMS offers unmatched robustness for business-critical apps

    Curious as to their justification for calling OpenVMS "hack-proof", I did a quick search on the article and found only this little blurb:

    OpenVMS also has excellent security. A hacking contest was held at the DefCon 9 conference in July 2001, where the winner was not NT, XP, Solaris, Linux or BSD. It was VMS, which was rated "cool and unhackable".
    Interesting... I suppose. The article is mostly fluff and makes no mention of more mainstream operating systems for mission critical applications such as z/OS, and focuses more on using OpenVMS on the now (sadly) defunct Alpha architecture... which lacks many of the high availability features of zSeries mainframes.
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B0
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B1
    [ redacted ]
  • bascule
    omgpwnies!
    • Jul 2003
    • 1946

    #2
    I'd be interested as to the source of the "cool and unhackable" quote. Anyone?
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B0
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B1
    [ redacted ]

    Comment

    • bascule
      omgpwnies!
      • Jul 2003
      • 1946

      #3
      Originally posted by 0versight
      So its never been hacked since then? I mean I find it kind of stupid when Organizations/Companies and otherwise proclaim such a thing not only on the basis that software is created by humans but they only give people a couple hours, days, or even weeks to hack this thing. Some exploits/attacks and whatnot out there took months to come up with. Everything is breakable if you give it time.
      I don't think you should take the article too seriously, considering it reads like a giant advertizement for HP.
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B1
      [ redacted ]

      Comment

      • gzzah
        A Globochem Company
        • Jan 2004
        • 101

        #4
        Originally posted by bascule
        I don't think you should take the article too seriously, considering it reads like a giant advertizement for HP.
        *cough*

        http://www.securitytracker.com/alert...l/1010684.html
        We own everything so you don't have to!

        Comment

        • -sS
          Member
          • Jul 2004
          • 4

          #5
          Originally posted by gzzah
          LOL! And it is dated the same as the press release. Nice.

          Comment

          Working...