Not sure where I am going with this. I saw a vanity license plate the other day that read GR8*68 on a 1968 Chevy. I am not a linguist, but lately I have become interested in Ebonics and leet speak and their effects on the English language. I notice the use of Ebonics more and more in the work place and have recently noticed the emergence of leet speak. With the growing number of computer savvy young people joining the workforce they are bringing their language with them. It reminds me of Orwells "newspeak". At one time I thought Ebonics to be a language used mainly by uneducated poor minorities. There is a simple beauty to the language however. Whereas Ebonics is a culturally driven language I see leet speak as a technologically driven language. By my reasoning wouldn't the use of leet speak identify the user as someone who is educated and computer literate? I see leet speak as a batch file type language, conveying an idea or group of ideas in as little space as possible. I am just wondering if the use of Ebonics and/or leet speak doesn't make a contribution to the English language. The "flappers" of the 20's, the "Beatnics" of the 50's, the "hippies" of the 60's all added to and enriched English, perhaps the "script kiddies" are doing the same at this time. I know that leet speak is shunned on this board, but what are the ideas of some of the members on the validity of leet speak as a language or as a dialect of the English language? Any thoughts?
<endtrans>
<endtrans>
Comment