Maybe. A lot depends on physical proximity to each other; FHSS is intended to minimise the effects of this problem.
Yeah, but as far as I am aware, we will see a reduction in bandwidth as a result from collisions to a certain extent. Although please corret me if I am wrong.
Originally posted by skroo
This is pretty much what they're proposing. It's basically a ghetto version of TDMA.
Sounds cool but i can see a few problems, firstly the WLAN card is going to have to be virtually seperated with two virtual interfaces with different MAC addresses. While a protocol known as 802.11D aims to quicky quickly update the source and destinatiom MAC addresses of upstream switches, it is not fas enough for these purposes.
The other problems i can see is the physical switching delay as a client card switches between channels. The people that developed syncscan think that channel switching delays vary between 5 - 19 ms. http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/%7Eiramani/sync_scan.pdf Alhtough Im not 100% sold on the methods they used to acomplish this.
I think connecting to 2 AP´s is possible but i think that the performance would be poor. Or is this idea not based on performance?
Comment