so a few folks in the past have asked me about beverage cooling contraptions that rely on electricity. the contest rules have historically stated "all devices must be entirely self-sufficient (in particular, they should not require use of an electrical outlet)" but just recently one contestant posed the following argument to me...
"Seeing as how technically the ice-powered coolers aren't self-sufficient (the ice is made elsewhere [using conventional, modern power sources]) can there be a modification to the rules for peltier-based coolers?"
simply on the grounds that the above statement is one of the most innovative arguments of creative yet totally consistent logic i am bending the rules this year and allowing this person (and anyone else who wants to) to employ external power sources (that's assuming we can get an extension cord out there, i'll have to check on that)
bear in mind, the rules as i have now modified them read "all devices must be as self-sufficient as possible (in particular, people should try to avoid the use of an electrical outlet)"... so folks who have long orange wires as part of their design may find themselves ranked slightly below others who employ something totally self-contained. if you need lots of power, points would be awarded a great deal for finding a totally independent (yet still portable) solution. (i even tried to cobble together something that would run on a super-small gasoline generator that i was making with a chainsaw engine just as a proof of concept.)
i think that next year perhaps i'll split things into two categories... those that require external (outlet-style) power to operate and those that do not. this year, all players are in the same field but fully-independent and self-supporting contraptions will have an advantage.
"Seeing as how technically the ice-powered coolers aren't self-sufficient (the ice is made elsewhere [using conventional, modern power sources]) can there be a modification to the rules for peltier-based coolers?"
simply on the grounds that the above statement is one of the most innovative arguments of creative yet totally consistent logic i am bending the rules this year and allowing this person (and anyone else who wants to) to employ external power sources (that's assuming we can get an extension cord out there, i'll have to check on that)
bear in mind, the rules as i have now modified them read "all devices must be as self-sufficient as possible (in particular, people should try to avoid the use of an electrical outlet)"... so folks who have long orange wires as part of their design may find themselves ranked slightly below others who employ something totally self-contained. if you need lots of power, points would be awarded a great deal for finding a totally independent (yet still portable) solution. (i even tried to cobble together something that would run on a super-small gasoline generator that i was making with a chainsaw engine just as a proof of concept.)
i think that next year perhaps i'll split things into two categories... those that require external (outlet-style) power to operate and those that do not. this year, all players are in the same field but fully-independent and self-supporting contraptions will have an advantage.
Comment