Personal Digital Signatures
Collapse
X
-
Re: Personal Digital Signatures
there's a fine line between being a devil's advocate and being a guy standing in a crowd throwing water balloons around for no discernible purpose. a lot of your comments, while ostensibly geared towards simply stimulating the conversation, aren't based in anything factual and are just (not to be rude) you sort of pulling stuff out of your ass. don't get me wrong, stimulating conversations is good to do... but sometimes more than vague platitudes and pseudo-factual assertions are needed.
while i would dispute your overall assertion (i don't feel they have "100%" ability, nor would even RFID chips give them that) it is key to focus on your follow-up. "If they focus on you" is the important point to consider. Even a bullshit local D.A.'s office can totally rip your life apart and find out almost everything prosecutable that you've ever done. Why don't people go down for things like insurance fraud, theft, and other minor felonies 100% of the time? Because these offices don't have the resources to put people on it 100% of the time.
Technology like RFID, and any other tools that people tout as a way to extend law enforcement's ability to detect, solve, and prosecute crimes are a threat to civil liberties because they lower the bar for the state. Personally, i'm comforted that my local police department doesn't have a runaway budget and that my local prosecutor's office doesn't pay their people six-figures. The fact that they have limited resources means they are forced to pick and choose the matters with which they concern themselves. If they had technology tracking everyone, then every little wrongdoing (in theory) could become a cause for prosecution.
Well, i don't know what "cash" is really doing in that list because amounts less than $10,000 are typically untraceable in any meaningful sense. Other than that, you are listing all things that are optional and therefore specifically avoided by privacy-conscious folks.
A bit of an extreme statement. There are plenty of ways to become far more privacy-conscious without becoming Ted Kaczynski. Check some old archives of DefCon talks to see the multitude of tactics."I'll admit I had an OiNK account and frequented it quite often… What made OiNK a great place was that it was like the world's greatest record store… iTunes kind of feels like Sam Goody to me. I don't feel cool when I go there. I'm tired of seeing John Mayer's face pop up. I feel like I'm being hustled when I visit there, and I don't think their product is that great. DRM, low bit rate, etc... OiNK it existed because it filled a void of what people want."
- Trent ReznorComment
-
Re: Personal Digital Signatures
I was actually responding to the other poster, but your as well as anyones comments are always illuminating and welcome.
I'm sure there are I will check out the archives, sincerely thanks. But just one point, Ted Kaczynski was caught, turned in by a family member. Law enforcement was just after him. I was more referring to the full force of of the US Government, Military and combined allies. Which is what the other poster was referring to.
xorJust because you can doesn't mean you should. This applies to making babies, hacking, and youtube videos.Comment
-
Re: Personal Digital Signatures
As someone who used to occasionally track people by those means , I can tell you it isn't quite as easy as Enemy of the State or countless TV shows might have you believe. That kind of focus is a myth. Police access to such data as credit card, POTS or cell phone records is not real time, or even near real time. In many cases, datum is close to 24 hours old (or more) before it is available. Yes, the time gap is narrowing, but don't believe everything you see.Well, i don't know what "cash" is really doing in that list because amounts less than $10,000 are typically untraceable in any meaningful sense. Other than that, you are listing all things that are optional and therefore specifically avoided by privacy-conscious folks..
As Deviant pointed out, it take an enormous amount of human resources to accomplish this type of thing. Police chiefs, DAs and other LE types are as budget conscious as a Depression-era mother with 12 kids to feed; maybe more so. They do not undertake such investigations lightly, and when they do, they bitch and moan about the costs to anyone in earshot. (As long as there aren't any reporters around.)
You wouldn't have to live in a cave to avoid such tracking, but you would have to have a good idea of what to avoid, go about it in a very precise manner and have your wits about you. Some things such as communications could be even easier that it used to be. But then again, your average criminal is a mouth breather with a room temperature IQ. Most people who commit crimes make some fundamental mistakes which leads to their downfall. It follows then that most people who commit crimes -and are going to be the focus of an investigation- are not likely to think hard about evading detection, although they may try hard to avoid arrest. Those are two vastly different things.Thorn
"If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning." - Catherine AirdComment
-
Re: Personal Digital Signatures
you mean shows like CSI aren't an accurate depiction of how the work of forensics is conducted?
"I'll admit I had an OiNK account and frequented it quite often… What made OiNK a great place was that it was like the world's greatest record store… iTunes kind of feels like Sam Goody to me. I don't feel cool when I go there. I'm tired of seeing John Mayer's face pop up. I feel like I'm being hustled when I visit there, and I don't think their product is that great. DRM, low bit rate, etc... OiNK it existed because it filled a void of what people want."
- Trent ReznorComment
-
Re: Personal Digital Signatures
Hahahahaha. "Lots of flash and no meaning" sums it up very well.you mean shows like CSI aren't an accurate depiction of how the work of forensics is conducted?
Thorn
"If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning." - Catherine AirdComment
-
Comment

Comment