Re: Defcon 17 suggestions
Okay, it's complicated. Okay, it's prone to failure. But party passes would be one hell of an application!
I was toying around with the idea of random IDs and Bloom filters for counting interactions (and possibly badge exploits if that had panned out), but it didn't really work without support of the creator of the badge. There could be multiple layers, though, such that parties could be "first degree", "second degree". If you've spoken with someone that spoke to a party organizer, your badge could validate you. Those that forge their filter (it wouldn't difficult, but neither would it be trivial) deserve to get into parties.
It would be silly, but I don't think that silly would scare any of us away.
Okay, it's complicated. Okay, it's prone to failure. But party passes would be one hell of an application!
I was toying around with the idea of random IDs and Bloom filters for counting interactions (and possibly badge exploits if that had panned out), but it didn't really work without support of the creator of the badge. There could be multiple layers, though, such that parties could be "first degree", "second degree". If you've spoken with someone that spoke to a party organizer, your badge could validate you. Those that forge their filter (it wouldn't difficult, but neither would it be trivial) deserve to get into parties.
It would be silly, but I don't think that silly would scare any of us away.
).
Comment