Conficker C

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • valkyrie
    Member
    • Jan 2006
    • 360

    #16
    Re: Conficker C

    Originally posted by streaker69
    So what are my fellow BoFH's going to be doing before April 1st to prepare for this?

    Should we warn our users ahead of time that internet access may be limited during that time frame?

    Someone posted this on another forum:

    http://www.bothunter.net/

    I haven't had a chance to use it yet, but it seems like it might be a good way to track down if you have any machines that are currently infected.
    thanks for this post streaker. I will yank it and test it. I have a smallish client who is dependent on their internet accesses, so this may be helpful. Oh! and thanks for the compendium. I am about half way through it. :-)

    Regards,

    valkyrie
    __________________________________________
    sapere aude

    Comment

    • g3k_
      General rogue
      • Jan 2009
      • 358

      #17
      Re: Conficker C

      Originally posted by streaker69
      So what are my fellow BoFH's going to be doing before April 1st to prepare for this?

      Should we warn our users ahead of time that internet access may be limited during that time frame?

      Someone posted this on another forum:

      http://www.bothunter.net/

      I haven't had a chance to use it yet, but it seems like it might be a good way to track down if you have any machines that are currently infected.
      Thanks for the link! We don't plan on telling our users anything about April 1st :3 Thats how bastardy we are :P
      "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

      Comment

      • bjaming
        Registered Luser
        • Feb 2009
        • 185

        #18
        Re: Conficker C

        I'm sure you are already aware, but there's a couple other ways to find conflicker and/or test the vulnerability against your internal systems:

        http://iv.cs.uni-bonn.de/wg/cs/appli...ning-conficker

        and using nmap;

        http://www.skullsecurity.org/blog/?p=209
        Network Jesus died for your SYN

        Comment

        • g3k_
          General rogue
          • Jan 2009
          • 358

          #19
          Re: Conficker C

          Mr Kaminsky made a post that hit Slashdot earlier today. He's compiled some python tools that were written by him, Tillmann Werner and Felix Leder. (if you read this Dan, mad props :3)
          http://www.doxpara.com/?p=1291
          http://www.doxpara.com/?p=1285

          I haven't had a chance to test these as a server got hosed over the weekend, but when I was doing some mucking around on our DC, I noticed that Conficker was trying to infect it, so something on our network is infected. I'll probably get to using these tonight or tomorrow and I'll post my results for anyone that is interested :x
          Last edited by g3k_; March 30, 2009, 12:55. Reason: gave credit to werner and leder, also corrected spelling
          "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

          Comment

          • bjaming
            Registered Luser
            • Feb 2009
            • 185

            #20
            Re: Conficker C

            yeah I think the scs.py reference in your first link is on the second link I posted, I downloaded and ran it didn't seem to report any vulnerable machines on the network here but I'm getting some conflicting results from other scanning methods. (GFI LanGuard for some ungodly reason is installed here...not sure which one is reporting the correct information just yet, but I am inclined to trust Kaminsky over GFI for some reason...

            edut-also LOL at your sig
            Last edited by bjaming; March 30, 2009, 13:29.
            Network Jesus died for your SYN

            Comment

            • g3k_
              General rogue
              • Jan 2009
              • 358

              #21
              Re: Conficker C

              Originally posted by bjaming
              yeah I think the scs.py reference in your first link is on the second link I posted, I downloaded and ran it didn't seem to report any vulnerable machines on the network here but I'm getting some conflicting results from other scanning methods. (GFI LanGuard for some ungodly reason is installed here...not sure which one is reporting the correct information just yet, but I am inclined to trust Kaminsky over GFI for some reason...
              I don't know... I did watch him pee himself at Hacker Jeopardy D:
              "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

              Comment

              • g3k_
                General rogue
                • Jan 2009
                • 358

                #22
                Re: Conficker C

                I'm a little late to the party with this, but here is something I put together when I cleaned Conficker from my network. Its basically an autorun batch that eliminates Scheduled Tasks (that the worm makes), deletes prefetch files (that the worm makes, that is pointed to by the Scheduled Tasks), it then displays the Windows version to show you which SP you are on (it had better be SP3, but I know in enterprise stuff slips through the cracks sometimes (unless you push this stuff through policy like a good network admin should, which is not what my network admin does D:)), it will run the MSRT for March to remove it and whatever (includes .C, it also removes the autorun infection), then it will run the patch to patch the hole in SVHOST that allows this in the first place, all narrated by a something I thought was funny at the time (my boss sure did) Also included on the ISO is SP3 and a handy scanner from Symantec that you should use if you think the computer is infected with something including Conficker, which was the case in our network D: All included with a run-on sentence.

                I know its nothing special and its a little late in the game to be putting this out there. Feedback, comments, flames welcome.

                http://www.disillusion.us/?page_id=110
                "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

                Comment

                • g3k_
                  General rogue
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 358

                  #23
                  Re: Conficker C

                  You guys ready? 2 more hours to go.
                  "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

                  Comment

                  • theprez98
                    SpoonfeederExtraordinaire
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 1507

                    #24
                    Re: Conficker C

                    I doubt anything big happens at this juncture. Maybe a few sites get DOS'd because of the increased lookups.
                    "\x74\x68\x65\x70\x72\x65\x7a\x39\x38";

                    Comment

                    • xor
                      not
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 1347

                      #25
                      Re: Conficker C

                      I heard on the local news that China; being that is it already 4/1 there, has reported few problems.

                      I guess the survivalist of the world will have to wait some more; maybe next year.

                      xor

                      Ps. I got a chuckle when the news caster told people that turning off your computer for the entire day on 4/1 wouldn't fix the problem.
                      Just because you can doesn't mean you should. This applies to making babies, hacking, and youtube videos.

                      Comment

                      • bjaming
                        Registered Luser
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 185

                        #26
                        Re: Conficker C

                        Originally posted by g3k_
                        posting guy posts stuff
                        there are typos in your typos. "separate" not "seperate"

                        teehee

                        :-)

                        edut-also, I"ve put the fear of God in the windows admins at my work, but get this (the best part) the director (or as I call him 'dumbass') literally told one of the windows admins "would you bet your job on patching and rebooting these servers" since they are production.

                        I replied to 'dumbass' and asked him if he would bet his job on none of these systems failing due to his lack of maintenance.

                        sometimes I really really hate my job
                        Network Jesus died for your SYN

                        Comment

                        • xor
                          not
                          • Aug 2007
                          • 1347

                          #27
                          Re: Conficker C

                          Yawn !!!

                          Current Internet Threat Level

                          The threat level has been lowered to AlertCon 1.

                          http://www.symantec.com/business/security_response/

                          xor
                          Just because you can doesn't mean you should. This applies to making babies, hacking, and youtube videos.

                          Comment

                          • streaker69
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 1141

                            #28
                            Re: Conficker C

                            Originally posted by xor
                            Yawn !!!

                            Current Internet Threat Level

                            The threat level has been lowered to AlertCon 1.

                            http://www.symantec.com/business/security_response/

                            xor
                            We have a Beige alert. If my wife calls, tell her I said 'hello'.
                            A third party security audit is the IT equivalent of a colonoscopy. It's long, intrusive, very uncomfortable, and when it's done, you'll have seen things you really didn't want to see, and you'll never forget that you've had one.

                            Comment

                            • g3k_
                              General rogue
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 358

                              #29
                              Re: Conficker C

                              The scanner that they published works wonders. I'm caught some of the stragglers last night, but it looks like some new PCs got infected, which is strange for a few reasons.
                              "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

                              Comment

                              • g3k_
                                General rogue
                                • Jan 2009
                                • 358

                                #30
                                Re: Conficker C

                                http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2344198,00.asp Its verrrrry verrrry quiet. Its huntin wabbits.
                                "As Arthur C Clarke puts it, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic". Here is my corollary: "Any sufficiently technical expert is indistinguishable from a witch"."

                                Comment

                                Working...