Here's a headline suitable for the tabloids: "Aircraft bomb finds may spell end for in-flight Wi-Fi"
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ight-wifi.html
The logic here is that since wireless devices might be used as remote triggers, that the commercial WiFi on flights should be stopped.
Now this ignores a great many factors, while making great security theater. First and foremost is the fact that these devices could already be used for triggers as long as someone was willing to ignore FAA and FCC regulations - something that someone intent on committing a crime like blowing up an airliner probably isn't going to be worried about in the first place.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ight-wifi.html
Last week's discoveries cast doubt on the wisdom of in-flight communications, says Roland Alford, managing director of Alford Technologies, an explosives consultancy in Chippenham, Wiltshire, UK. He says he expects the technology to be scrutinised in the security reviews being undertaken by the UK government and US Department of Homeland Security in the wake of the discovery of the printer bombs.
Now this ignores a great many factors, while making great security theater. First and foremost is the fact that these devices could already be used for triggers as long as someone was willing to ignore FAA and FCC regulations - something that someone intent on committing a crime like blowing up an airliner probably isn't going to be worried about in the first place.
Comment