I understand your frustration. I wasn't around when the initial questions were asked, and I'm sorry for that.
As long as we're not going to be shuffled out the door for not using netstumbler, I'll be fine.
The only difference between the output I produce, and the output produced by a wi-scan program such as netstumbler will be the number of lines. Netstumbler outputs basically one line per second per network for the data, and kismet only outputs one line per network. I have enough information to generate 4 lines per network (see earlier post).
Your initial post just seemed like you were giving us the finger. :)
Will it be possible for me to submit a dump of my logs and have them passed by Pete Shipley to verify if they'll work?
Thanks, and any help will be appreciated.
--Medic
As long as we're not going to be shuffled out the door for not using netstumbler, I'll be fine.
The only difference between the output I produce, and the output produced by a wi-scan program such as netstumbler will be the number of lines. Netstumbler outputs basically one line per second per network for the data, and kismet only outputs one line per network. I have enough information to generate 4 lines per network (see earlier post).
Your initial post just seemed like you were giving us the finger. :)
Will it be possible for me to submit a dump of my logs and have them passed by Pete Shipley to verify if they'll work?
Thanks, and any help will be appreciated.
--Medic
Comment