Originally posted by aj3001
Using Exploits
Collapse
X
-
Although being very good at the time, gcc has changed somewhat in the generation of assembly code since then.. a lot of the gcc generated for the initial stage of the function won't be the sizes you'd expect logically anymore (the redhat 2.96 version was quite possibly the worst for this)Originally posted by cheGoogle for "Smashing the stack for fun and profit". That should get you going. (one of these days, I will actually ready it myself!)
Because of this, it makes it harder for someone entirely new to the concept to just grab the doc and start working along in tandem. So, conceptually, it's still very good.. but if you want to work along and are struggling because gcc isn't doing what you really think it should be, you'd want to consider purchasing one of the newer books out there.a pc-0x90 by any other name is a nummish..
Bigger 1:23Comment
-
Hehee, neither is Latin....Originally posted by datawormThere is quite more than you think... I know COBOL, and there is aloth of people knowing it... Beleive it or not COBOL is't a dead language...
Don't you think that the reason COBOL isn't 'dead' is because of all the stuff out there that was already developed? i.e. is anyone here actually working on NEW projects that utilize COBOL?
Fortran is still alive in the math & physics departments of many major universities....some languages will always have staying power...
LosTComment
Comment