Using Exploits

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gadsden
    Goon
    • Jul 2002
    • 1241

    #16
    Originally posted by aj3001
    I have read the board rules and dont think this is breaking any but if it is, can a mod or admin just delete this topic, cheers
    I would like to know how to hack using exploits, does anyone know any good eBooks? or be willing to tell me how to do it. I am not a n00b when it comes to hacking, I know stuff about it, it is said that if you know how people hack, you can learn how to reduce the risk of you being hacked yourself. my email address is ajb1388@hotmail.com if you would prefere to talk to me over msn about it, thank you
    -Aj3001
    Google for "Smashing the stack for fun and profit". That should get you going. (one of these days, I will actually ready it myself!)
    Happiness is a belt-fed weapon.

    Comment

    • pc-0x90
      Total Jerkface
      • Apr 2002
      • 64

      #17
      Originally posted by che
      Google for "Smashing the stack for fun and profit". That should get you going. (one of these days, I will actually ready it myself!)
      Although being very good at the time, gcc has changed somewhat in the generation of assembly code since then.. a lot of the gcc generated for the initial stage of the function won't be the sizes you'd expect logically anymore (the redhat 2.96 version was quite possibly the worst for this)

      Because of this, it makes it harder for someone entirely new to the concept to just grab the doc and start working along in tandem. So, conceptually, it's still very good.. but if you want to work along and are struggling because gcc isn't doing what you really think it should be, you'd want to consider purchasing one of the newer books out there.
      a pc-0x90 by any other name is a nummish..
      Bigger 1:23

      Comment

      • LosT
        Contest Creator / Goon
        • May 2004
        • 1389

        #18
        Originally posted by dataworm
        There is quite more than you think... I know COBOL, and there is aloth of people knowing it... Beleive it or not COBOL is't a dead language...
        Hehee, neither is Latin....

        Don't you think that the reason COBOL isn't 'dead' is because of all the stuff out there that was already developed? i.e. is anyone here actually working on NEW projects that utilize COBOL?

        Fortran is still alive in the math & physics departments of many major universities....some languages will always have staying power...

        LosT

        Comment

        • Code
          • Jun 2004
          • 15

          #19
          What are you talking about? All real hackers know that exploits are written in Java applets...


          - CD

          Comment

          Working...