Here is an example of how the media misuses the word "hacker" only to get people to read their filth...
http://forum.defcon.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=489
I highlighted the usage of the word hack, and terror, and noticed that on this report there are the exact same amount (18) references of each... coincidence?
Personally I have always perferred the terms, Attacker, Defender... when talking to persona-non-technica only to not assist in painting a bad picture that a 'hacker' is always malevolent.
I also have a problem with those labels such as:
black hat,
gray hat,
white hat...
To me they are all overused buzzwords... this would again be best defined as measuring skills in attacking or defending... If you need to use it to get a job, fine, jump at the opportunity, but don't put in on your biz card, or mention it to everyone you see...
http://forum.defcon.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=489
I highlighted the usage of the word hack, and terror, and noticed that on this report there are the exact same amount (18) references of each... coincidence?
Personally I have always perferred the terms, Attacker, Defender... when talking to persona-non-technica only to not assist in painting a bad picture that a 'hacker' is always malevolent.
I also have a problem with those labels such as:
black hat,
gray hat,
white hat...
To me they are all overused buzzwords... this would again be best defined as measuring skills in attacking or defending... If you need to use it to get a job, fine, jump at the opportunity, but don't put in on your biz card, or mention it to everyone you see...
Comment