Since we occasionally purge zero postcount users that have been inactive for over 2 years, it makes sense the measure of an active user as a user who has been active within the past 2 years,
A feature has been enabled to show "active users" at the bottom.
About 90% of all users have been active within the past 2 years, while only 10% have been inactive for more than 2 years. (Not too bad when you think about it.)
Users with postcount greater than 100: 72 (less than 1% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 50: 139 (a bit over 1% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 25: 228 (a bit over 2% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 10: 442 (around 4.5% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 5: 757 (around 7.6% of all users.)
User with a postcount of 0: 7540 (around 75% of all users)
And of those 7540 users with zero postcount, only 520 of them have zero postcount as a result of having all of their posts put into /dev/null or Fucktard Hall.
This means we have MANY lurkers and occasional periodic users. (7020 user who have never posted, but who have been active within the past 2 years.)
A feature has been enabled to show "active users" at the bottom.
Members: 9,997, Active Members: 8,996
Users with postcount greater than 100: 72 (less than 1% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 50: 139 (a bit over 1% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 25: 228 (a bit over 2% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 10: 442 (around 4.5% of all users.)
Users with postcount greater than 5: 757 (around 7.6% of all users.)
User with a postcount of 0: 7540 (around 75% of all users)
And of those 7540 users with zero postcount, only 520 of them have zero postcount as a result of having all of their posts put into /dev/null or Fucktard Hall.
This means we have MANY lurkers and occasional periodic users. (7020 user who have never posted, but who have been active within the past 2 years.)
Comment